Civil Disobedience in the Era of Videogames

Christopher J.H. Ho

doi:10.51661/bjocs.v12i2.187

Abstract

This paper demonstrates that the ‘gamification’ of the 2019-220 Hong Kong extradition protests was instrumental to the longevity of the protests and their success in repealing the Extradition Bill. Two elements of the protests are identified to be both crucial and game-like: the ‘play’ and the ‘meta-game’ elements of the protest. The play element is best exemplified by the mobile application colloquially known as ‘Popomon Go’, where ‘players’ are incentivized to go on ‘missions’ to seek and geotag police officers to form a heat-map of police officers throughout Hong Kong, as well as gather their personal data. The meta-game element, on the other hand, looks at every other aspect of those games except the gameplay. The combination of these two elements helped an apparently leaderless civil disobedience movement evade mass arrest, reduce anxiety, and increase efficiency, but also led to a long period of civil disobedience, thus placing more pressure on policy decision makers.

Image: Digital posters advertising Hong Kong protest events that circulated on Telegram (Anonymous, 2019)

Civil Disobedience in the Era of Videogames: Digital Ethnographic Evidence of the Gamification of the 2019-20 Extradition Protests in Hong Kong

Introduction

This essay analyses the use of videogaming elements in acts of civil disobedience in the context of the 2019-20 Extradition Protests in Hong Kong (HK). By way of context, in 2018 HK discovered it was harbouring a murderer: 19-year-old Chan Tong-kai had murdered his girlfriend in Taiwan before fleeing back to HK. However, since there was no extradition agreement between HK and Taiwan, there was the possibility that Chan might escape justice. In response, the HK Government sought to amend the Fugitive Offenders Ordinance and Mutual Legal Assistance Ordinance (hereafter, the Bill) to plug this legal loophole. The Bill planned to remove the geographical limitations on extradition, making it possible to extradite Chan to Taiwan but also, by extension, others to Mainland China.

The timing of the Bill, however, was poor, for the public’s confidence in the Government was still low following the 2014 Occupy Central protests and 2016 Mong Kok Riots, especially considering that there had been protests against a similar proposed bill back in 2003 (Harney & Mackay, 2003). As a result, civil groups and individuals took to the streets to protest the Bill, fearing it would strip them of their autonomy and legal protections in HK. The ensuing protests at the early stages were peaceful, but after 10 June 2019 protests were more likely to devolve into violence, and the events that did so could be better characterised as riots. This essay only focuses on the latter variety and investigates the impact of videogames on these types of protests, especially events following the storming of the Legislative Council on 1 July 2019, after which point multiple Telegram channels were created to promote gamified violence.

The literature on the economic potential of videogames is well-established (Marchand & Hennig-Thurau, 2013; Tomić, 2019), and the potential for videogames to be used in smart power exploits – such as civil disobedience – has also received attention in recent years (Davies, 2020). This essay takes the 2019-20 Extradition Protests in HK as a case study by examining how videogames and their respective mechanisms were adopted by rioters (as opposed to peaceful protesters) to gamify the protests and perpetuate the momentum of the movement. My findings are based on digital ethnographic fieldwork and textual analysis of multi-media sources such as online forums and posters. The remainder of this essay is organised around two thematic videogame elements: the ‘Play’ and the ‘Meta’.

Play

Some videogames are designed to simulate reality. The game Liberate Hong Kong (2019) (Fig.1), for example, was designed to simulate the HK protests throughout 2019-20 to deliver “the experience [of rioting] to the non-frontline fighters” (Bloomberg Quicktake, 2019: 0:55). However, the videogame also functioned as a tutorial, teaching players how to riot in HK. The game does this by rewarding players for “throwing tear-gas canisters back at the police” (SCMP, 2019a, 0:20), ducking from rubber-bullets when warning signs are raised and when they “hide away bullets [and from arrest]” (Bloomberg Quicktake, 2019, 1:46-2:00). When coupled with virtual reality technology, such as an Oculus Rift headset, a simulation of the riots could also be used by people outside of Hong Kong and be exported to “enhance [this type of] digital activism [abroad]” (Bloomberg Quicktake, 2019, 2:15).

Figure 1: Screenshot of the Liberate Hong Kong videogame homepage, 2022, Unnamed Protestor.

Another example of the riots gamified is the game PopomonGo (Fig.2C) which is derived from combining the functionalities of the website and mobile app Hkmap.Live with social-media platforms like Telegram and LIHKG.com (Fig.2B). The title ‘PopomonGo’ and its style of gameplay referred to the wildly successful augmented-reality game Pokémon Go (2016-present). However, rather than catching imaginary creatures, PopomonGo was devised to help rioters to evade arrest and to cyberbully police officers. There were two parts to this game. The first part incentivised players to go on ‘missions’ to seek and geotag HK police officers in real-time, which formed a heat-map of the locations of police officers throughout HK. The heat-map in turn helped those on the frontline to evade arrest (Fig.2A) and preserve their numbers for subsequent ‘missions’. These ‘missions’ were then advertised on posters and widely circulated online – as well as affixed to “Lennon Walls” throughout the city (Fig.3). These walls functioned like noticeboards, relaying pro-protest information and further doubling as political sanctuaries for protestors to gather and share words of encouragement for one another.

Figure 2: Censored screenshots of @PopomonGo and @hkmaplive on Telegram, and LIHKG forums, 2021.

Figure 3: Digital posters advertising Hong Kong protest events that circulated on Telegram, 2019, Anonymous.

The second part of the game was to profile police officers, mimicking Pokémon Go’s ‘stats’ function in which the details of a captured Pokémon would be displayed. The stats of a ‘captured Popomon’, however, would be the personal details of that individual, discovered, stolen, and uploaded by users on Telegram, hkchronicles.com and/or Google Drive after combing their social media profiles (Wong, Brian, 2021; see Figs.2&4). Details could include the officer’s name, ID number, phone number, address, and details of their children, parents, and spouses – sometimes even their love interests (Fig.4). This was referred to as ‘game-data’ (jau4 hei3 zi1 liu2 遊戲資料; see Fig.4A) within the PopomonGo world. Similarly, private images of officers and their families uploaded to the game were predicated on the idea of harmless gameplay, which was referred to as ‘in-game photos’ (jau4 hei3 tou4 pin3 遊戲圖片; see Fig.4A). The language used within the game further dehumanised officers and their families by using words like ‘dogs’ (gau2 狗; see Fig.4A), ‘cockroaches’[1] (gaat6 zaat6 曱甴; see Fig.4B), and the use of animal pronoun ‘it (they)’ (taa1(mun1) 牠(們); see Fig.4B). The ‘it’ pronoun is characterised by its use of the semantic indicator ‘cow’ (ngau4 牛) instead of ‘male’ (jan2 亻) in ‘he’ (taa1 他) or ‘female’ (neoi5 女) in ‘she’ (taa1 她), to strip them of their individuality and humanity.

Figure 4: Censored screenshots of PopomonGo game details on Telegram, 2021.

The gamification of HK’s riots, as demonstrated above, effectively trivialised the psychological violence directed against officers and their families under the veil of gameplay. The phenomenon of referring officers as ‘it/them’, ‘dogs’ and ‘cockroaches’, for instance, echoes Kelman’s (1973: 48) psychological explanation for mass violence, as summarised in Kafumann et al, where perpetrators of violence see their victims “outside [their] moral kinship or scope of justice, and thus [were] a legitimate target for… oppressions and exclusions” (2011:87). A similar effect is seen in the way non-playable characters (NPCs) are treated in other videogames, as violence inflicted upon NPCs is generally exempt from real-world moral repercussions. It was through this and other methods of gamifying rioting that an escalation of violence was promoted in 2019-20. For example, prior to the breaking in of the Legislative Council on 1 July 2019, protestors mainly relied on previously established methods of rioting that were reminiscent of “the 2016 violent clashes in Mong Kok” by “breaking up pavements to hurl [bricks] at [the] police” (RTHK, 2019). But after 1 July 2019, Telegram channels promoting gamified violence had begun to emerge that coincided with the timing of the escalated violence. This included the normalised use of petrol bombs (Lau, 2020), assassination attempts with box-cutters (SCMP, 2019b), arrows fired against officers (Ong, 2019), as well as injury inflicted on bystanders (SCMP, 2019c; Wong, Kayla, 2019; Siu, 2019; Wong, Brian, 2020).

Moreover, a secondary effect of the game was to reduce police morale by adding psychological stress for the officers and their families, on top of the physical stress officers had to endure when suppressing the riots on a daily basis (China Daily, 2019; Tsang, 2019). This combination of psychological and physical stress resulted in a number of resignations (Leung, 2020) and consequently decreased the overall efficiency of the police force, allowing rioters more opportunities to prolong their protests (Lo & Lau, 2019; Lo, 2020).

The intent of using violence to disrupt the reading of the Bill on 12 June 2019 was always clear, as demonstrated by testimonials of ex-Legislative Council member, Charles Mok, and protestors alike, who claimed that they have “no choice” but to use violence and that peaceful protests “are no longer working” (BBC Newsnight, 2019, 0:43-1:26 & 2:27-3:08). However, protestors were neither satisfied when Chief Executive Carrie Lam suspended the Bill on 15 June 2019, nor when Lam declared that the Bill “is dead” on 9 July 2019. To that end, rioters readily adopted the use of lethal force to deal with frontline officers, and officers also had to use increasing force in return. This resulted in an undermining of the city’s political and moral integrity through the propagation of news articles citing police brutality in the international media,[2] which in turn increased international pressure on local politicians to permanently withdraw the Bill on 4 September 2019.

At the time of writing, PopomonGo still has some users. However, newly uploaded content is swiftly censored for violating either the law or Telegram’s terms of service. One of the applications used during the 2019-20 period, Hkmap.Live, has a spiritual successor known as zau2 gwai5 走鬼or, ‘run, the cops are here’ (Fig.5). Along with its rebranding, the app’s function has also been ostensibly revised: it now helps users evade parking fines. However, the implicit function of the app for monitoring the movements of officers and evading police action remain clear.

Figure 5: Screenshots from Zau Gwai走鬼 and its entry on Apple’s App Store, 2021.

Key: Red – Police Presence Blue – Sightings of Police

Grey – Tickets Issued 幫 (bong1; help) – Pro-protest Outlets

Meta

During the riots, violent protestors made use of terminology and systems which paralleled videogame ‘metas’. Metas refer to the systematic ways in which videogamers discuss, improve, rate and share gaming strategies. For example, rating of strategies is usually done through tiered-ranking systems ranging from A to F, with A being the most prized. When this system was borrowed by rioters, riot gear was graded using the same kind of tier system (Fig.6). This simplified the decision-making process for rioters who were seeking to procure weapons and defensive tools for upcoming missions.

Figure 6: Digital posters of Gas Mask Tier-lists on Telegram, 2019, Anonymous.

Similarly, rioters shared ‘recipes’ on social media platforms for things like Molotov-cocktails. Recipes (Fig.7) in videogames are the meta-manuals used to create weapons or other items within the game world and are a core gaming mechanic in games like Minecraft (2011-present), Don’t Starve (2013-present) and Magicite (2014). This also added to the gamification of rioting and enabled less experienced protestors to participate. By circulating recipes and using visual cues reminiscent of videogames, the knowledge barriers to entry were lowered and the prospect of rioting gamified. The spread of recipes via Telegram therefore contributed to the increased use of Molotov cocktails and other home-made weaponry.

Figure 7: Censored screenshots of weapon recipes on Telegram, 2021.

The names chosen for these recipes implied that rioting was nothing more than a game. For example, a recipe for a truncheon-like blunt weapon was called a ‘cow-beating... toy’ (daa2 ngau4 打牛...玩具; Fig.7-8) and a recipe for making Molotov-cocktails was titled ‘basic fire magic’ (jyun4 ci2 fo2 mo1 faat3 原始火魔法; Fig.9). These recipes can also be tweaked, improved, or personalised to fit the gamer’s individual needs: for instance, ‘mid-tier fire magic’ (zung1 gaai1 fo2 mo1 faat3 中階火魔法) and ‘napalm fire magic’ (min1 sing3 fo2 mo1 faat3 粘性火魔法), were variations of the basic fire magic recipe which produces Molotov cocktails, respectively, with either greater explosive power or an added gelling property to the flames. The naming pattern of these recipes furthermore echoed the appellations of (fire) magic spells in games such as World of Warcraft[3] (2004-present) and RuneScape[4] (2001-present), which further alludes to the idea that rioting is akin to videogaming.

Figure 8: Image of Recipe #056 on Telegram, 2020.

Figure 9: Collage of Molotov cocktail recipe-related screenshots on Telegram, with instructions redacted, 2022.

These recipes and the weapons that they described allowed protestors to fulfil their gaming fantasies. Rioters could pick and choose from the many recipes that best represent their chosen riot personas. A sharp-shooter, for instance, would make use of “slingshots” (daan6 gung1彈弓), “air-guns” (hei3 coeng1 氣槍; Fig.7) or the classic bow and arrow combination (AFP, 2019). These riot personas were structured in a way that mirrored the class systems found in popular role-playing games. Similar to those games, it becomes natural for players to seek others to form a party with skills that complement one another in order to succeed in future missions. The combination of videogaming culture, visual cues, and lexicon saw rioters band together to mass-produce booby-traps (Marzo, 2019), Molotov-cocktails (Fig.9; 10; Channel 4 News, 2019, 2:24-3:08; Sky News, 2019, 1:00) and other weapons, as well as to establish training camps (AFP, 2019; Channel 4 News, 2019, 0:00-0.11; Sky News, 2019, 1:59) and socialising hubs (Sky News, 2019, 1:23) within the grounds of universities across HK. These camps resulted in significant, large-scale, violent clashes such as the Siege of the Chinese University of Hong Kong and the Siege of the Hong Kong Polytechnic University.

Conclusion and Further Considerations

This essay has shown through digital ethnography and textual analysis the ways in which violent protestors used elements from videogames to operate, communicate and organise their members and events. It was evident that videogame technology, vocabulary, and imagery were central aspects of perpetuating the Hong Kong protests, attracting potential protesters and escalating protester violence. However, a more comprehensive analysis of this under-researched area is required to assess the wider implications for society: 1) whether a wider variety of videogame techniques have been borrowed by protesters to compel lawmakers and government officials to permanently suspend the Bill; 2) whether participants/organisers of these games could be tried for organised crimes; 3) whether involvement in these games have lasting (psychological) damage on young participants; 4) whether locations with a high saturation of gamers, such as Seoul and Tokyo, pose an increased risk in which such exploits can be taken advantage of; and subsequently, 5) whether law enforcers or criminologists can create predictive models to accurately identify and mitigate the said exploits as they emerge.

Finally, with further research into how videogames and videogame culture were exploited during the Hong Kong protests, researchers may be able to uncover ways in which other multi-media platforms could be utilised in the future by other civil disobedience actors.

Ludography

Don’t Starve (2013), Android/iOS/Linux/Microsoft Windows/Nintendo Switch/PlayStation 3/PlayStation 4/PlayStation Vita/Wii U/Xbox One [game], Klei Entertainment: Vancouver, Canada

Liberate Hong Kong (2019), PC [game], Unnamed Protestor: Hong Kong

Magicite (2014), PC/New Nintendo 3DS/Nintendo Switch/PlayStation 3/PlayStation 4/Wii U/Xbox 360/Xbox One [game], SmashGames: Florida.

Minecraft (2011), Android/iOS/PC/Nintendo Switch/PlayStation 3/PlayStation 4/PlayStation Vita/Wii U/Xbox One [game], Mojang Studios: Stockholm.

Pokémon Go (2016), Android/iOS/iPadOS [game], Niantic: San Francisco.

RuneScape (2001), Android/iOS/PC [game], Jagex: Cambridge

World of Warcraft (2004), PC [game], Blizzard Entertainment: Irvine.

References

Agence France-Presse (2019), “Breaking bad: HK students go from books to archery and Molotov cocktails”, YouTube, November 14, available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=39hW5pSkyEM (accessed 25.09.2021).

BBC Newsnight (2019), “Hong Kong: Mass protests turn violent but China says story is ‘distorted’”, YouTube, June 13, available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMTc8ml5yo0 (accessed 27.07.2022).

Bloomberg Quicktake: Now (2019), “Video Game Shows What It's Like Inside Hong Kong's Protests”, YouTube, November 15, available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?

v=Wwr_49mImKQ (accessed 25.09.2021).

Channel 4 News (2019), “Hong Kong protests: Inside the university campuses becoming makeshift fortresses”, YouTube, November 14, available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QF_NHn9FyRo (accessed 25.09.2021).

China Daily Hong Kong (2019), “Cyberbullying of police officers, families draws growing criticism”, June 27, available at: https://www.chinadailyhk.com/articles/14/1/219/1561574384182.html (accessed 17.08.2021).

Davies, Hugh (2020), “Spatial Politics at Play: Hong Kong Protests and Videogame Activism”, RMIT University.

Economist Impact Events (2019), “Open Future Festival Hong Kong”, YouTube, October 5, available at: https://youtu.be/zzNuXzf7rqY (accessed 27.07.2022).

Harney, Alexandra and Angela Mackay (2003), “Hong Kong Scraps Subversion Bill That Sparked Massive Demonstration”, Financial Times, September 6.

Kelman, Herbert (1973), “Violence without moral restraint: Reflections on the dehumanization of victims and victimizers”, Journal of Social Issues 29(4): 25–61.

Lau, Chris (2020), “Firebombings, terror threat make budget increase vital: Hong Kong police chief”, South China Morning Post, March 2, available at: https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/law-and-crime/article/3064632/hong-kong-police-chief-says-bumper-budget-increase (accessed 12.09.2021).

Leung, Christy (2020), “Nearly 450 Hong Kong police quit job amid last year’s protests, bureau says”, South China Morning Post, April 8, available at: https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/law-and-crime/article/3079045/nearly-450-hong-kong-police-officers-quit-unexpectedly (accessed 12.09.2021).

Lo, Clifford (2020), “As Hong Kong protests raged, police solved lowest percentage of cases in 19 years” South China Morning Post, February 28, available at: https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/law-and-crime/article/3052754/hong-kong-protests-raged-police-solved-lowest (accessed 26.09.2021).

Lo, Clifford and Chris Lau (2019), “Hong Kong police ‘overwhelmed’ as protesters unleash new level of violence”, South China Morning Post, October 1, available at: https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/article/3031156/hong-kong-police-overwhelmed-anti-government-protesters-unleash-new (accessed 12.09.2021).

Marchand, André and Thorsten Hennig-Thurau, (2013), “Value Creation in the Video Game Industry: Industry Economics, Consumer Benefits, and Research Opportunities”, Journal of Interactive Marketing, 27(3): 141-157.

Marzo, Aidan (2019), “A makeshift bomb made from a gas canister with bolts attached”, Cable News Network, November 17, available at: https://edition.cnn.com/asia/live-news/hong-kong-protests-live-nov-18-intl-hnk/h_7806c2a38f45d96f5f2b6eb1236e7ead (accessed 25.09.2021).

Oliver, Sophie (2011), “Dehumanization: Perceiving the Body as (In)Human”, 85-97, in Paulus Kaufmann, Hannes Kuch, Christian Neuhäuser and Elaine Webster (eds.), Humiliation, Degradation, Dehumanization, Dordrecht: Springer.

Ong, Tanya (2019), “Hong Kong police officer shot in leg by arrow during escalation of protest violence”, Mothership.sg, November 17, available at: https://mothership.sg/2019/11/arrow-hit-police-officer-hk-protests/ (accessed 14.09.2021).

RTHK (2019), “Police warn protesters against throwing bricks”, June 12, available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20190613151322/https://news.rthk.hk/rthk/en/component/k2/1462314-20190612.htm (accessed 27.07.2022).

Sky News (2019), “Hong Kong students battle with police”, YouTube, November 14, available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gTlnSJZP7i0 (accessed 25.09.2021)

South China Morning Post (2019a), “VR game recreates immersive experience as a frontline protester”, YouTube, December 6, available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hVbPw4ZGYY4 (accessed 26.09.2021).

—— (2019b), “Hong Kong protesters go on yet another rampage, attacking police, meting out mob justice and trashing train stations and mainland China-linked businesses”, October 13, available at: https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/society/article/3032749/hong-kong-protesters-go-yet-another-rampage-attacking-police (accessed 7.10.2021).

—— (2019c), “Hong Kong protests: man seriously hurt after attack by anti-government demonstrators as street fights between rival groups erupt”, September 16, available at: https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/law-and-crime/article/3027364/hong-kong-protests-man-seriously-hurt-after-attack (accessed 21.09.2021).

Siu, Phila (2019), “Hong Kong man hit over head with drain cover while clearing protesters’ barricades in Mong Kok”, South China Morning Post, December 1, available at: https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/law-and-crime/article/3040106/hong-kong-man-hit-over-head-drain-cover-while-clearing (accessed 7.10.2021).

Tomić, Nenad (2019), “Economic Model of Microtransactions in Video Games”, Journal of Economic Science Research 1(1): 17-23.

Tsang, Denise (2019), “Police ‘threatened and humiliated’ in backlash to force’s response to protests”, South China Morning Post, June 16, available at: https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/3018530/more-1000-join-journalists-silent-march-hong-kong-accusing (accessed 16.10.2021).

Unnamed Protester (2022), “Liberate Hong Kong”,itch.io, available at: https://lhk.itch.io/ (accessed 30.05.2022).

Wong, Kayla (2019), “Hong Kong protesters beat up Japanese man after mistaking him for a mainland Chinese”, Mothership.sg, November 13, available at: https://mothership.sg/2019/11/news-hong-kong-japanese-man-protesters-beaten-up/ (accessed 21.09.2021).

Wong, Brian (2020), “Hong Kong protests: man set on fire says he was standing up for justice when confronting black-clad mob”, South China Morning Post, July 9. Available at: https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/law-and-crime/article/3092549/hong-kong-protests-man-set-fire-says-he-was-standing (accessed 21.09.2021).

—— (2021), “Hong Kong Immigration Department ex-clerk pleads guilty to misconduct for ‘al-Qaeda-style’ doxxing attack on 215 people”, South China Morning Post, September 14, available at: https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/law-and-crime/article/3148690/hong-kong-immigration-department-ex-clerk-pleads (accessed 1.10.2021).

Notes

[1] The later adoption of the phrase “cockroaches” may have also been a reaction to people referring to rioters as cockroaches due to their chosen black uniform and their signature hit-and-run tactics.
[2] When asked to condemn the violence in Hong Kong after the Bill was withdrawn, during a live debate between Shaun Rein and Joshua Wong on 5 October 2019, Wong famously refused to do so and held his ground by stating that the “use [of] force and [maintaining] public support” was a matter very important to the protestors (Economist Impact Events, 2019, 2:40:42-2:44:34).
[3] “Fireball”, “Improved Fireball”, “Empowered Fireball”, “Greater Fireball” etc.
[4] “Firestrike”, “Fire Bolt”, “Fire Blast”, “Fire Surge” etc.

Civil Disobedience in the Era of Videogames: Digital Ethnographic Evidence of the Gamification of the 2019-20 Extradition Protests in Hong Kong

Download Citation

Abstract

2337 Article Views